Here's a good one - One of our groups down here is short 3 locators -1 quit, 1 was fired and 1 transferred. For the last month they have had mandatory week-end work to keep up (along with volunteers from other groups). They are probably running 40-50% O.T. Now a hiring freeze is initiated. My question is: Is it more profitable to have fewer locators and large amounts of O.T. or to staff up properly and have very little O.T.? Maybe from a pure $$ standpoint the fewer employees offers a better profit margin, but how does a higher rate of turnover effect the bottom line? I am sure there are people a lot smarter than me making these decisions but something doesn't seem to add up at gut level. I am wondering if Robbie boy left us in bad shape?
Maybe in the next few weeks things will start to make sense, however I don't have a very good feeling about what's happening right now. It nearly feels like a co. that's about to go under, or do a drastic cut-back. Neither option will bode well for us peons.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote




but even these people run into burn out
and a little pat on the back and some consideration should be given to these people too. Don't assume that they ALWAYS want to work like dogs.
Okay.. I think I am rambling now.



Bookmarks