How do you get banned II

**USIC1** · February 14th, 2009, 10:03 PM

Now!!!!

As far as not being able to indoctr-urinate on the previously locked thread

I would like to follow-up on others concerns over my stances on issues and to address any cry babying going on behind the scenes... I say that the only reason others try an crimp my style is because of the strong cases ie facts and lengthy personal very intelligible viewpoints and in some cases go far beyond most others comprehension around here...Also I dont want to leaving out the well presented ways presented ie grammar, sentence structure, etc... in bringing such points to the table....

A run on sentence here and there is no defense in avoiding the case that most of you valiantly deflect for lack depth on the issues...

Ok now I APPROVEthe re locking...

**TBONE** · February 14th, 2009, 11:44 PM

Just get back in your corner and behave for awhile

**AULupstate** · February 15th, 2009, 12:29 AM

This IGNORE list so awesome!!!!

**RD_Wrangler** · February 15th, 2009, 01:04 AM

USIC1, do you honestly think that so many people would say your posts are garbage if it weren't true?!?! Man, I valiently tried to comprehend your ramblings for at least the first two days I was here. I finally gave up.

It isn't just your grammer. Hell, most of the guys on here lack gramatical skills. It isn't spelling either. It definitely isn't that your insights are so vast or beyond comprehension that others can't follow it (The idea you believe this one amuses me! LOL!). It's CONTENT. Or rather LACK THEREOF. Frankly man, most of your posts don't tell the reader WHAT the hell you're talking about, much less your views on a topic!

You like Socialism? So listen to the masses! With that many complete strangers arriving at the same conclusion, there's gotta be some truth to it!

**AULupstate** · February 15th, 2009, 01:08 AM

Wrangler,

Control panel, scroll to ignore, type USUC1's name in and it's like magic. He disappears!!!!

**RD_Wrangler** · February 15th, 2009, 01:26 AM

Originally Posted by AULupstate

Wrangler,

Control panel, scroll to ignore, type USUC1's name in and it's like magic. He disappears!!!!

Yeah, I'm doing that now AUL

**sprayandpray** · February 15th, 2009, 08:57 AM

First the Sic1 gets banned from Wal-Mart(definitely justified), then he's either banned from Truck Driving, or Truck Driving School(he never came clean on that issue) and now ya'll are banning him from this Forum(1 member at a time). Next thing you know he'll be banned for playing his Trumpet(Does anyone else think his music probably sounds about like his posts ? Incomplete , Incoherent and Out of Tune)
Well, I for one will keep the Sic1 on my viewing list as his every post just fortifies my belief that Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is not correct all of the time!
Keep 'em coming Sic1!

**RD_Wrangler** · February 15th, 2009, 10:17 AM

Originally Posted by sprayandpray

First the Sic1 gets banned from Wal-Mart(definitely justified), then he's either banned from Truck Driving, or Truck Driving School(he never came clean on that issue) and now ya'll are banning him from this Forum(1 member at a time). Next thing you know he'll be banned for playing his Trumpet(Does anyone else think his music probably sounds about like his posts ? Incomplete , Incoherent and Out of Tune)
Well, I for one will keep the Sic1 on my viewing list as his every post just fortifies my belief that Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution is not correct all of the time!
Keep 'em coming Sic1!

On the contrary spay...

There are many people that are the anamolies that prove the rule. If it weren't for the human race's insistance on the right of all our species survival, reguardless of fitness to do so, then those of such ilk would have perished long ago.

Whether by starvation, exile, or outright inter-species killings. Let's face it, there are some individuals that are quite incapable of survival without the insurance of their fellows, (children excluded of course). If homo-sapien allowed itself to be darwinistic in it's social interactions like other species, then our population would be a tad lower.

Not that I think we should consider Social Darwinism as an acceptable practice...(well usually

), just pointing out that it doesn't really apply to humans.

Wow, I get kinda dark on Sunday mornings! LOL!

**USIC1** · February 15th, 2009, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by RD_Wrangler

USIC1, do you honestly think that so many people would say your posts are garbage if it weren't true?!?! Man, I valiently tried to comprehend your ramblings for at least the first two days I was here. I finally gave up.

It isn't just your grammer. Hell, most of the guys on here lack gramatical skills. It isn't spelling either. It definitely isn't that your insights are so vast or beyond comprehension that others can't follow it (The idea you believe this one amuses me! LOL!). It's CONTENT. Or rather LACK THEREOF. Frankly man, most of your posts don't tell the reader WHAT the hell you're talking about, much less your views on a topic!

You like Socialism? So listen to the masses! With that many complete strangers arriving at the same conclusion, there's gotta be some truth to it!

Now that your an official member of lets say "The Herd" I can only present to you in my best interests for your welfare a reminder of the many cliffs you may easily fall prey to...

**TheCableVine** · February 15th, 2009, 12:04 PM

Originally Posted by USIC1

Now that your an official member of lets say "The Herd" I can only present to you in my best interests for your welfare a reminder of the many cliffs you may easily fall prey to...

This is a good example of what RD Wrangler is saying. The sentence above, having all jibberish removed should read: Now that your an official member of "The Herd" I can only present to you a reminder of the many cliffs you may easily fall prey to...

But, this is still nonsensical since you don't fall prey to cliffs. You fall off of cliffs. If this was an attempt at some kind of twisting of words to be funny, well, you 'fell' a little short.

And, furthermore, he doesn't present any reminders. that was the whole purpose of the sentence.

I think USIC1 has Attention Deficit Disorder.

**USIC1** · February 15th, 2009, 12:23 PM

Originally Posted by TheCableVine

This is a good example of what RD Wrangler is saying. The sentence above, having all jibberish removed should read: Now that your an official member of "The Herd" I can only present to you a reminder of the many cliffs you may easily fall prey to...

But, this is still nonsensical since you don't fall prey to cliffs. You fall off of cliffs. If this was an attempt at some kind of twisting of words to be funny, well, you 'fell' a little short.

And, furthermore, he doesn't present anything.

I think USIC1 has Attention Deficit Disorder.

Ok you got me on this one but you lost on the turtle and the hare...

So this was only a redeeming technicality of an earlier thread that still skirts the issue of standing behind the wrong way of thinking...

**TheCableVine** · February 15th, 2009, 12:30 PM

You should read William Strunk and E.B. Whites book; The Elements of Style.

I read some of it, however, I think Strunk would disagree with me. Everytime I write something of any length I have that book in the back of my mind.

**Wingfoot** · February 15th, 2009, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by USIC1

Now!!!!

As far as not being able to indoctr-urinate on the previously locked thread

I would like to follow-up on others concerns over my stances on issues and to address any cry babying going on behind the scenes... I say that the only reason others try an crimp my style is because of the strong cases ie facts and lengthy personal very intelligible viewpoints and in some cases go far beyond most others comprehension around here...Also I dont want to leaving out the well presented ways presented ie grammar, sentence structure, etc... in bringing such points to the table....

A run on sentence here and there is no defense in avoiding the case that most of you valiantly deflect for lack depth on the issues...

Ok now I APPROVEthe re locking...

Here is Wingfoot's honest attempt to put the SIC1's post in a language most can understand.

----------------------------------------------

Now!!!!

Fellow Viners!!!

As far as not being able to indoctr-urinate on the previously locked thread

I am pissed that the original "How Do You Get Banned?" thread is locked. I've got something to add......

I would like to follow-up on others concerns over my stances on issues and to address any cry babying going on behind the scenes...

I must confront you Viners who want me banned. You members piss & moan about my liberal views and my struggle to transfer my thoughts and beliefs in an easy to read format to theVine. I have the same privilege to be here just as much as you.

I say that the only reason others try an crimp my style is because of the strong cases ie facts and lengthy personal very intelligible viewpoints and in some cases go far beyond most others comprehension around here...

Some of you guys think you are better than me. You are all wrong. I learn from members like Wingfoot to do the in-depth research. I dig for the facts to reinforce my liberal views. Then I share my research the best way I can and it pisses you off.

Also I don't want to leaving out the well presented ways presented ie grammar, sentence structure, etc...in bringing such points to the table....

Don't let my piss poor spelling, grammer & typing skills fool you.

A run on sentence here and there is no defense in avoiding the case that most of you valiantly deflect for lack depth on the issues...

You guys are the real dummies.

Ok now I APPROVEthe re locking...

Now I've said my piece.

----------------------------------------------

**AULupstate** · February 15th, 2009, 01:18 PM

Wing, I didn't know you spoke USUCINESE!!! Great translation effort my friend!!

**TheCableVine** · February 15th, 2009, 01:34 PM

While reading that I was reminded of that character on "In Living Color". The prisoner played by Damon Wayans (I think) who tries to speak intelligently but ends up butchering the English language.

Here it is. Oswald Bates