One of the blanket orders I have run into from time to time is to not route tickets in the order of best efficiency, do the tickets in the order of the time the call was taken by the call before you dig call center.
For those of you who have not had this or heard of this I know you are open mouthed in disbelief but this is true. Let’s take a look at what really happened over the years.
The office I worked out of had a bunch of locators working under a number of different foremen. The workload was generally heavy and a lot of tickets were starting to get done after the due date with some of the locators.
The reason varied with the problem locators. Some exercised poor judgment through no ill intent and chose the wrong routing in scheduling their work. Others were trying to rack up impressive hourly production numbers and were completely disregarding time constraints. Worse case were locators who had some difficult tickets they did not wish to mark and would wait until the excavator had finished, go to the site and declare that none of their utilities were in the way of the dig.
The first breakdown in the management chain was the foremen who did not correct the individual locators.
The second breakdown was with the manager over the foremen who instead of correcting the foremen issued a direct blanket order to all locators to do the tickets in the order of the time the ticket was received at the call center.
The result was that the locators who were not having problems with tickets being completed suddenly had this problem. Because they would do a ticket and the ticket for the house next door, across the street or the next block over was not allowed to be done because a ticket several miles away had been called in five minute earlier. Now they were spending a large about of time, gas, wear and tear on a vehicle, driving back and forth across the area.
They repeatedly were passing tickets that could have been efficiently done.
After awhile the tickets were again being done on time and the manager removed the equipment that tickets be done in order of their received time thinking that his order was the reason for the success, nothing could be further from the truth.
The locators who had not been having late tickets until the flawed order were being berated for now having late tickets. So they did what they had to, they did the tickets in the order they would have done them anyway and falsified the completion time. I do not know what the poor locators who caused the mess did to eliminate their on time problems but somehow they came around enough or left the firm. So the good locators got the company back to making money and keeping the client utility happy.
I must make one very important point, no tickets that were not completed were called in as completed. Only tickets that were completed were reported as completed, just the completion time reported as later than it actually was.
I have seen this repeated numerous times over the years. Each time the command was disobeyed so the tickets were completed on time and the completion time falsified to make it appear the order was being followed.
As the years progressed the method of how the completion times were adjusted to make it appear the order was being followed adapted to the changes in how tickets were recorded as completed.
Whatever the method used by the locators the manger always thought their order which resulted in more late tickets had solved the problem rather than making it worse.
The relevancy today is that many of those old managers who did this are still out there and trying to rely on this old failure which they never could understand was a failure. But in many cases today the locators cannot save the managers from themselves. These managers are scratching their heads trying to understand why their old tried and true method no longer worked. I imagine some of them think there is some sort of rebellion among the locators. No rebellion, just quiet acceptance of what they can no longer change.
This practice of pulling the bosses fat out of the fire by circumventing foolish orders is ancient and not restricted to the locate industry. Chuck Yeager wrote in his autobiography of being in change of the aircraft maintenance crews on one airbase. The aircraft’s routine maintenance schedule is dictated by flight hours of the craft. The base commander ordered that all planes get their maintenance by the order of their tail numbers, starting at the lowest. This of course would have resulted in catastrophic failures, crashing planes and dying aircrews. So Yeager got a can of spray paint and some stencils and changed the tail numbers to whatever they needed to be to get their required maintenance. (After he transferred out they spent years straightening out which plane was which)
Now with GPS tracking on trucks and cell phones (and a GPS tracking paint stick is under development) if the locators followed the most efficient routing instead of doing them in order of the time stamps they would be fired. The locators just cannot save their bosses from themselves as they have done over the previous years.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks